| 
			
			 | 
		#1 | 
| 
			
			 Guest 
			
			
			
			
					Posts: n/a
				 
				
				
				
				
 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Here's a little idea I came up with. As long as I haven't completed the whole routine, I like to call the effect the "Chicago Closer". 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	![]() And please just ignore the few flashes.XD  | 
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#2 | 
| 
			
			 Marcos Olivero 
			
			
			
			
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			It's a really good idea, i like it. I was working on a similar... "thing" a while back ago, i'll PM you some suggestions that can't be made in public.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#3 | 
| 
			
			
			
			
			
				
			
			 Join Date: May 2012 
				
				
				
					Posts: 75
				 
				
				
				
				
 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Nice one. I like the idea for the... you know. Creative.
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#4 | 
| 
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			The main "move" can also be done totally "in the hands" as you spread for a selection (pm me if you need help).  This way you wouldn't have to table the deck to make the selection.  I'd also work on the move a bit more, because it did draw a little suspicion while everything else looked great.  Overall its a nice, straightforward handling for the Chicago Opener.  Good work!
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#5 | |
| 
			
			 Guest 
			
			
			
			
					Posts: n/a
				 
				
				
				
				
 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Thanks a lot! 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	Quote: 
	
 ![]() Oliver  | 
|
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#6 | 
| 
			
			 Tom 
			
			
			
				
			
			
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Hey dude...  
		
		
		
		
		
		
			Everything looks good although the turnover could be a lot more natural. Although a spectator might not know exactly what you're doing, it still counts as a flash because at the moment it's a very suspicious looking move. I'm sure you could get this to look awesome though!  
		
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	My cigar is not a symbol. It's only a cigar. - Sigmund Freud  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#7 | 
| 
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			Another thought that may be useful is that you could do a standard display of the face of the spread deck by making one small adjustment first.  When I first saw the vid, I thought the first two cards you showed us were "selections", I didn't realise that this was a "shuffled deck" display.  A fairer way to show us this is to show us the entire face of the deck as you spread it, and as I said above, you CAN do this without flashing anything.  Just an idea  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	 
		 | 
|
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
| 
			
			 | 
		#8 | 
| 
			
			 Red 
			
			
			
				
			
			
	 | 
	
	
	
		
		
			
			 
			
			That was pretty sweet man, all the pointers were hit too! Good luck!
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
		
		
		
		
	-This the bottom of my thread.  | 
| 
		 | 
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
			
		
		
		
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  |